AI-powered operational discovery

Before AI acts, Stereologic understands.

Automation is only as good as the evidence underneath it.

Stereologic uses a compound AI system to discover and understand real operational work — the business process maps, the data, and the decisions across and within your applications — and turns them into measured cost and capacity, detecting delay and value leakage. It is the context layer AI automation needs before automation decisions are made.

How Stereologic understands your operation
Work happens fragmented across the claims application, interruptions, Excel, email, handoffs and rework. Stereologic reconstructs it into one coherent operational view of cases, handoffs, variants and elapsed time, so the business can see time, capacity, delay, variation and value leakage.

AI recognizes. A person approves. The model then behaves deterministically.

Organizations whose operations we have measured

  • CIBC
  • Citi
  • TD
  • Capital One
  • BMO
  • Royal Bank of Scotland
  • Webster Bank
  • Citizens Bank
  • East West Bank
  • BDC
  • Humana
  • CNA
  • Cigna
  • Texas Life Insurance Company
  • Wilton Re
  • Genworth
  • ivari
  • Sagen
  • Navy Federal Credit Union
  • Marcuard Family Office
  • Mackenzie Investments
  • Wyth Financial
  • Pitney Bowes
  • Niagara
  • Procter & Gamble
  • Axalta
  • Solera
  • U.S. Department of Labor
  • Idaho Department of Labor
  • City of Ottawa
  • City of Toronto
  • Florida Power & Light
  • Canada Post
  • AWIN Consortium

Named with permission. Published outcomes are attributed individually, with their scope and method, on the customer results page.

Why now

37%

Only 37% say AI has moved their EBIT.

In McKinsey & Company’s global survey “The state of AI in 2026: On the road to ROI” (25 August 2026, n=1,719), 37% of respondents reported that AI had contributed positively to their organization’s EBIT.

Most programmes automate a process nobody measured, so the saving can never be proven. Automation candidates get chosen from opinion, the current state is never captured, and there is no before-state to prove the result against.

Which number are you expected to move, and by when? Most leaders know the number. The harder question is what inside the operation is driving it.

Why Stereologic

The input problem

Why automation programmes stall

Most automation programmes are constrained less by the automation layer than by the input to it. Robotic process automation, document processing and workflow engines all assume you already know how the work actually runs.

Process documents hold high-level information — the intent, not the execution. They do not show the swivel-chair steps between applications, the rework loops, or the judgement calls people make on screen, which is usually where the time and the capacity go.

Automate the process you actually have, not the one on the wall.

30%Operational cost reduction
56%Customer-service acceleration
20% → 0%Errors in servicing customers
Under 90 daysResults achieved

Back-office customer management operations at Pitney Bowes. Figures are drawn from Stereologic’s published Pitney Bowes case study. Read the full story and method.

In their own words

Hear from leaders who’ve used Stereologic

Operations leaders share what they saw, what changed, and why they chose to work with Stereologic. Roles are given as held at the time of each engagement.

Role held at the time of the engagement. Published interview.
Role held at the time of the engagement. Published interview.

18 years spent on one problem: the work an organization cannot see3 granted patents on the discovery method itself

AI in Stereologic

AI where it earns its place — and a method you can check at every step.

“AI-powered” on its own tells an evaluator nothing, and running everything through a model is neither cheap nor reliable. Stereologic applies AI deliberately: to the recognition problems where it genuinely outperforms an analyst, on top of proprietary patented algorithms that do the rest. Nothing is hidden inside a black box.

  • AI where it is neededRecognizing applications and screens, the detailed activities inside them, the business data on the screen and the decisions behind how work branched — the problems where AI produces genuinely better results than a person with a stopwatch.
  • Patented algorithms where they are betterThree granted U.S. patents underpin the discovery and reconstruction method. Using proprietary algorithms rather than a model for every step keeps results consistent and the platform economical to run at enterprise scale.
  • Every step open to inspectionA process engineer reviews and approves recognition before anything is built on it, and assembly is deterministic. You can validate each step of the methodology rather than accept an answer whose derivation is hidden.
A compound AI system recognises the real work, producing knowledge inputs: applications and screens, detailed activities and microactivities, business data and the data dictionary, decisions and why work branched, and learning from every process-engineer correction. A person then approves it, and nothing downstream is built on unapproved recognition. The model is then deterministic: same work in, same answer out.

See exactly where AI does real work inside Stereologic

What our AI is pointed at

Recognizing activity is not the hard part. Recognizing business meaning is.

Plenty of tools can tell you an employee spent three hours and fifty-two minutes in the claims application. That does not tell you whether they processed forty claims or one, approved or rejected them, or got stuck. Our compound AI system is aimed at the second question, because that is the one the business is actually asking — and answering it takes several specialised models and algorithms working together, not one general-purpose model.

On the left, application usage shows three hours and fifty-two minutes in the claims application, screens opened and switches between applications. On the right, Deep Task Mining shows forty-one claims approved, twelve rejected with the reason, nine re-opened after a correction and six stalled waiting on a third party.
Deep Task Mining™ sees the finest details of employee activities and the business data inside the applications, so productivity, throughput and capacity can be measured rather than inferred.

Explore Deep Task Mining

The evidence layer

How Stereologic produces the evidence

This is the spine of the granted U.S. patent portfolio: the narrative, the architecture and the intellectual property describe the same thing.

01
Recording

Process Mining

Non-install, application-agnostic recording. Human operational work is observed as it is really performed — no-install, with non-intrusive desktop-recording software and no Administrator-level endpoint access.

02
Recognize

Deep Task Mining™

AI recognises applications, screens, business data, detailed activities and decisions. A process engineer reviews and approves at defined checkpoints.

03
Reconstruct

AI-Enabled Operating Model

Process Intelligence. Approved outputs feed deterministic assembly — complete case traces, combined into end-to-end paths and variants. Where event logs already exist and are usable, Process Mining is layered on to extend coverage into the system-recorded layer.

Deep Task Mining™ and, where event logs exist, Process Mining create the AI-Enabled Operating Model.

What you end up with

An AI-enabled operating model — scalable and insight-driven.

Deep Task Mining™ builds it. Where event logs exist and are usable, Process Mining extends it. This is the destination, and it is the reason the three stages exist. Not a report that describes your operation, but a working model of it: the applications and activities, the business data, the cases, the process maps and documentation — assembled into something your teams keep using after the engagement ends.

Deep Task Mining, extended by Process Mining where event logs exist. After a thirty-minute project setup: day one employees start to record, day two applications, screens and activities, day three the data dictionary, day four process cases, day five process maps and documentation, day six an AI-enabled operating model that is scalable and insight-driven. Deep Task Mining contributes observed employee work; Process Mining contributes system event data where that data is available.
Illustrative sequence for a defined scope. Actual duration depends on the scope agreed, the employees observed and the applications in use.
  • ScalableThe model is built from observed work rather than from workshops, so extending it to another team, another site or another process is a recording question — not another discovery project from scratch.
  • Insight-drivenEvery element carries its evidence. When someone asks why a variant exists or where a cost sits, the model answers from what was actually observed instead of from what somebody remembered.
  • Yours to keepProcess maps, documentation, the data dictionary and the case model remain usable after the engagement — including if you choose a different vendor for whatever comes next.
  • Automation-readyBecause the model carries observed activity, business data and case-level evidence, automation candidates can be identified, sized and prioritised from it — rather than chosen from opinion and discovered to be wrong in user acceptance testing.

Where this idea came from

A client described the goal in their own words: not a diagnostic, but an operating model the business could run on. That is what the six stages are built to produce.

See How It Works

Before you automate with AI

Before AI automates your business, Stereologic understands how it really runs.

An AI agent inherits whatever process you point it at.

This is the part most automation programmes discover late. An agent does not evaluate whether the work it has been given is sensible — it executes it. Point one at a process nobody has measured and you have automated the workarounds, the duplicate checks and the rework, faster and at scale.

  • Automation candidates chosen from opinionThe obvious candidates get automated; the expensive ones stay invisibleSpend lands where the noise is, not where the cost is
  • The as-is process was never measuredThe agent is built against a described process, not a performed oneExceptions surface in user acceptance testing, and the scope reopens
  • No before-state existsThere is nothing to measure the automated process againstThe benefit has to be asserted rather than demonstrated
  • Undocumented work stays undocumentedThe agent handles the happy path and escalates everything else back to peopleThe capacity saving quietly returns to the team it was taken from

Baseline first. Automate second. Stereologic measures how the work is actually performed, so the automation programme is designed against reality and the result can be demonstrated afterwards.

What is actually worth automating

How it works

Observe. Reconstruct. Understand. Act.

The first three stages produce evidence. The fourth is where the operation actually changes and the saving is realized — that is the point of the exercise.

  1. Observe

    Capture work as it is really performed across web, desktop, legacy and office applications — with non-intrusive, no-install desktop-recording software and no Administrator-level endpoint access, and without integrating source systems first.

  2. Reconstruct

    Join fragmented activity into cases, end-to-end processes, handoffs and variants, including the interruptions and workarounds that never reach a system record.

  3. Understand

    Explain why the operation behaves as it does: where time goes, why the same work takes longer in one team, and what is driving delay, rework and lost capacity.

  4. Act

    Change the process, standardize it, remove unnecessary work or automate it — then measure the operation again to confirm the improvement was actually realized.

See How It Works

Why Stereologic

Four differences, and what each one is worth to you.

System records show one layer of the process. Stereologic connects that layer with the human work and the business activity happening inside and between those records.

  • Lower deployment and preparation burdenEvidence can start being collected in weeks, not after a log-extraction projectA faster path to a business answer, and a decision that does not wait on IT
  • Observation across many applications at onceLess per-application preparation and customizationBroader operational evidence, so conclusions rest on the whole operation
  • Real employee work, not a demonstrated taskInterruptions, switching, handoffs and actual behaviour become visibleYou can see where capacity and customer time are really being lost
  • The complete work measured over timeActive work is separated from elapsed process and customer timeYou can explain why something taking minutes of effort still takes days to finish

Why start with Stereologic

Compare Stereologic with Celonis, Skan.ai, Mimica and Apromore

Real work vs demonstrated work

Why has the customer been waiting a week?

A workshop shows you a clean five-minute task. The real operation contains interruptions, other cases, email, spreadsheets, waiting, handoffs and corrections. Optimize the clean task and you save minutes. Reconstruct the real operation and you can explain the week.

The demonstrated task runs A to B to C in five minutes. The real operation runs A, interruption, another case, email, Excel, wait, handoff, return, correction, then B — five minutes of work spread across days of elapsed time.
Five minutes of active work can sit inside days of elapsed customer time. Only one of those two views explains the delay.
Value leakage

Detect it. Understand why it happens. Remediate it.

Value leakage is not a number you hand to someone else to fix later. Stereologic measures where effort, capacity and customer time are escaping, explains the cause, and supports the change that recovers them.

Observed work becomes measured effort in hours, then recoverable capacity in FTE, then a financial case calculated on the client's own rates and assumptions.
Every financial figure is calculated on your rates and your assumptions, on top of measured effort rather than estimates.

Reduce cost and recover capacity

Where Stereologic becomes relevant

Start with the problem you need to answer.

01

Where is effort and cost being lost?

Measure where operating effort is consumed, recover capacity, and size the opportunity before deciding what to change.

02

What is the real current state before we change systems?

Establish a measured baseline of how the operation runs today, so a transformation programme is designed against reality.

03

What is actually worth automating?

Separate what should be standardized, improved, automated or kept human before more investment goes into AI or automation.

04

Why does the same work happen differently across teams?

Expose variation, workarounds and undocumented steps, and separate the deviations that exist for a real reason from the ones that do not.

Explore solutions

Trusted by design

Enterprise AI without an installation on every desktop.

Built for enterprise environments where deployment, data residency and security review matter from day one — including where the AI processing happens.

Non-intrusive, no-install desktop-recording software

No Administrator-level endpoint access required.

Flexible deployment

On-premises or within the approved hosted or cloud environment.

No third-party AI engine calls

Processing stays within the approved deployment environment.

Built for enterprise review

Security documentation available for procurement and technical teams.

Explore Security & Deployment

Customer evidence

What the measurement produced

Named customer

Pitney Bowes

Reduce cost. Improve service. Eliminate errors.

  • 30%Operational cost reduction
  • 56%Customer-service acceleration
  • 20% → 0%Errors in servicing customers

Back-office customer management at Pitney Bowes. Results achieved in under 90 days. Winner, 2014 Process Excellence Award for Best Process Improvement Project under 90 days.

Read the story

Named sector

Major Canadian Bank

Nationwide retail-banking transformation.

  • $15MMAnnual operational cost savings
  • 22.5%Acceleration of customer services
  • 95%Reduction in errors and delays

Loan-origination platform stabilization across the branch network. Diagnosed and resolved in under six months. Bank not named at its own request.

Read the story

Anonymized analysis

Global Health Insurance Company

Medicare claims processing, onshore and offshore.

  • 69%Offshore FTE savings opportunity identified
  • 35%Onshore FTE savings opportunity identified
  • +5claims/hour offshore throughput opportunity

3,053 claims across 107 subtypes. Identified opportunities, not realized savings; the 69% applies to active time only, which was 65% of total time.

Read the analysis

See Customer Results

Take the next step

Find out where value is leaking out of your operation.

Bring one operational scope and the number you are being asked to defend. We will show how that work can be observed, reconstructed and measured — and what it would take to recover the loss.